Search
Back

“Derogatory” union bulletin board message sparks state labor relations complaint

The bulletin board message being challenged at the State Labor Relations Board

Two liquor control agents have filed a complaint with the Connecticut State Labor Relations Board alleging the Administrative & Residual Employee Union 4200 and the Connecticut Police & Fire Union are using the state-provided union bulletin board to harass them.

Erik Gagne and Barry Wallett filed the complaint after messages were posted to the bulletin board that said working at a job where there is a union but not joining the union is “freeloading.”

Both Gagne and Wallett resigned from the union following the 2018 Supreme Court decision in Janus v. AFSCME that ruled public sector workers could no longer be forced to pay union fees as a condition of employment. The court determined the fees violated public sector employees’ right to free speech. 

According to the complaint: “Since at least December 2018, one and/or both of the Respondent Unions have posted, and the State of Connecticut has allowed to remain posted, material on the state-provided bulletin boards that is intended to and does in fact harass and intimidate public employees who are not union members, discriminating against them on the basis of their union membership status.”

The message in question – a quote from Maine State Senator Cynthia Dill – was reportedly posted on union bulletin boards on multiple floors of the Connecticut State Office Complex in Hartford.

“Choosing to work where there is a union and getting the related benefits of higher wages and collective bargaining, but not paying a fair share of the costs of representation, would be freeloading, right?” the posting the bulletin board read.

Union bulletin boards are supplied by the employer – in this case, the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection, which is also listed in the complaint – for unions to post information and announcements. 

But according to A&R’s contract with the state, the bulletin board “shall not be used for material that is of a partisan political nature or is inflammatory or derogatory to the State employer or any of its officers or employees.”

Administrative & Residual Employees Union contract

“Unions have made or allowed a posting that accuses non-union employees of ‘freeloading,’ a derogatory term meant to suggest that non-union employees are somehow taking advantage of others,” the complaint states.

The Supreme Court decision in Janus v. AFSCME asserted that because labor unions insist on being the exclusive representative of employees in a workplace they must represent all employees equally regardless of union membership status or fees paid to the union.

“Nor can such fees be justified on the ground that it would otherwise be unfair to require a union to bear the duty of fair representation,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in Janus v. AFSCME. “That duty is a necessary concomitant of the authority that a union seeks when it chooses to serve as the exclusive representative of all employees in a unit.”

In a posting on their website, A&R labeled the complaint “bizarre” and “frivolous” claim by two non-union employees.

“The action against us, which we believe to be utterly frivolous, is being led by a national right-to-work group and was filed by a State Representative on behalf of two state employees not connected to A&R,” the website posting said.

Although Connecticut’s public sector unions have downplayed the effect of the Janus ruling – even growing their numbers by unionizing more groups of employees – references to those who either didn’t join or left the union have been less than complimentary.

We have 1,218 members and zero deadbeat freeloaders.

Ed Leavy, President of the Connecticut State Vocational Federation of Teachers

Ed Leavy, president of the Connecticut State Vocational Federation of Teachers told a union delegate convention that “we have 1,218 members and zero deadbeat freeloaders,” according to a June 2018 blog post by the American Federation of Teachers.

Both the A&R union and the CT SVFT union are affiliates of the American Federation of Teachers.

A&R also faces a federal lawsuit after union president John DiSette told two employees they were not allowed to attend the union holiday party because they were no longer union members but still had to pay dues to the union.  

Gagne and Wallett are asking the labor relations board to order the removal of the posting, make orders that prevent similar postings in the future and order that the bulletin board post a message, informing union members of their right not to be part of the union.

They are represented by attorney and State Representative Craig Fishbein, R-Wallingford, and The Fairness Center, a nonprofit legal foundation that represents public sector employees who have been mistreated by their union.

Truck advertising CT2030 outside the Capitol paid for by labor union

Lawmakers and visitors to the Legislative Office Building throughout the week may have noticed a truck with a digital sign advertising Gov. Ned Lamont’s new transportation plan called CT2030. It’s been driving in circles outside the LOB since Lamont met with Democratic senators earlier in the week. The truck, carrying ...

Read More

Big payoff to big labor in Gov. Lamont’s new transportation plan

Joined by union officials and members on Thursday, Gov. Ned Lamont pitched his new CT2030 transportation plan to leverage federal loans with toll revenue. But the plan also essentially guarantees that $21 billion in transportation projects will be awarded to unions who backed Lamont in his 2018 gubernatorial bid and ...

Read More

(4) Comments

  1. Tom

    November 20, 2019 10:08 am

    They are free leaders. If an employee works at a union shop but chooses not to pay dues then they (the employee) should be treated as if working at a free will shop ( not receiving pay or benefits of dues paying union members. This could be better or worse for the non union employee) and can be reprimanded or terminated without union representation. I feel it is the right of the employees to join a union or not but if not joining is chosen they should be under a different contract than a dues paying union member.

    • Elsa Wentworth

      November 21, 2019 12:01 pm

      Thank you, Tom, for calling these brave men leaders!

    • Michael O

      November 22, 2019 1:37 pm

      Certainly. But elected officials who represent all public citizens should not be harassing those that do not agree with that politician’s funding source. The battle to cancel harmful public pension contracts is already working its way through the RI court system – sure to find its way to the US Supreme Court. State employees unions are not entitled to encumber future generations simply because they funded and voted as a cartel to install politicians who intentionally harmed the public interest at the benefit of select groups. Benefits will be curtailed by the courts, a matter of when not if.

  2. Jimmy Johns

    November 20, 2019 8:33 am

    Lol Thank you SEBAC and A&R for my zero percent wage increases for 2 years, and my smaller raise this year. I could have negotiated that myself. They really need to get with the times and be more responsive to their younger members if they want to remain relevant in the 21st century.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SIGN UP TO RECEIVE OUR NEWSLETTER