Search
Back

Senate and House Democrats indicate support for new truck tolling plan

Gov. Lamont and Democrat leaders following a November meeting at the governor’s mansion

Senate Democrats gave tepid support for Gov. Ned Lamont’s plan to toll trucks following a long caucus meeting, but a special session on the matter remains in limbo as a bill has yet to be drafted and the numbers fully vetted.

Senate Democrats remained Lamont’s biggest hurdle after rejecting the governor’s original CT2030 plan because it would toll all vehicles. 

Senate President Pro Tem Martin Looney, D-New Haven, said his members remained concerned about oversight of the Department of Transportation and ensuring the tolls remain for only trucks, rather than cars.

Senate Democrats caucused for several hours as both anti-toll and pro-toll protesters waited in the hallway having occasional light-hearted chanting sessions as senators walked by.

Earlier in the day, Speaker of the House Joe Aresimowicz, D-Berlin, said he was “comfortable” the plan would pass in the House, but said bill language still has to be drafted and revenue and expense numbers fully fleshed out before a vote can be taken.

“I feel very comfortable is the way I termed it and I still feel very comfortable,” Aresimowicz said. “There are some questions left to be answered, there’s the finality of the bill actually being written up and getting the bill in their hands so they can read it, but I feel very comfortable that we can move forward.”

The truck tolling plan has been slightly changed: only 18-wheeler tractor trailer trucks will be subject to tolls, not box trucks that are often used by tradesman or moving companies.

This change lowers the projected revenue from tolls from the original estimate of $187 million to “between $150 and $175 million,” according to Aresimowicz.

The speaker added that he does not believe a vote on tolls will hurt Democrats’ elections prospects during the 2020 election. “I absolutely do not,” Aresimowicz said. 

Senate Democrats appeared less confident. Looney said he had to protect his members from “partisan attacks,” by adding provisions to the yet-to-be-drafted tolling bill.

Republican Senate Leader Len Fasano, R-North Haven, and House Republican Leader Themis Klarides, R-Derby, said their members remain steadfastly opposed to any tolls and cast doubt on whether or not Democrats actually have the votes to pass the plan.

“There’s no toll plan, let’s be clear. I’m not exactly sure what today was about. They don’t have a bill, they don’t have a plan, they’re saying it’s changing as we talk, the revenue is going down,” Fasano said. “If they had the votes, they’d vote it. We all know how this building works.”

“What we heard of what they said today just appears to be a regurgitation of the past, except for the fact that the amount of money that they were anticipating to get from the first trucks-only plan – which wasn’t enough at the time – is now less,” Klarides said. “We are still strongly against tolls for all the reasons we’ve given before.”

If passed, the truck tolls would not take effect until about 2023, although a lingering lawsuit brought by trucking associations against the state of Rhode Island over the state’s truck-only tolls threatens to undermine the whole plan. Democrats say they are “confident” Rhode Island will win the case.

The changing numbers and details led Joseph Sculley, president of the Motor Transportation Association of Connecticut, to question the governor and Democrat leaders’ credibility on the plan. 

“No one should trust these numbers,” Sculley said in a press release. “It is clear they are not based on any reliable information.”  

In a statement, Lamont thanked the Democratic caucuses for meeting and said he looks forward to more discussions.

“These are decisions that prior elected officials put off for decades and Connecticut can no longer afford to kick the can down the potholed road,” Lamont said. “I look forward to continuing these discussions so we can adopt a plan to finally fix out transportation system and get our state’s economy moving again, in short order.”

Aresimowicz predicted a special session could occur in the last half of the month of January.

Yankee’s newest video: “Synchronized voting” for tolls?

Legislative leaders in the Connecticut House of Representatives and Senate proposed holding “synchronized voting” for a tolling bill because it was so unpopular with the public neither chamber wanted to go first and neither was confident the other chamber had enough votes to pass the bill.

Read More

Republicans question revenue numbers on truck-only tolls

At a press conference before a public hearing on Gov. Ned Lamont’s bill to toll trucks, Senate Republican Leader Len Fasano, R-North Haven, presented the fiscal note for the bill, which states that the revenue estimates from tolls are only “preliminary” and “not investment grade.” Senate Republican obtained the fiscal ...

Read More

(5) Comments

  1. Joe Freer

    January 30, 2020 7:10 pm

    It’s apparent that most of our elected officials do not work for the general public anymore. They should be removed out of office by us the voter on election day. Let it be known to them that we do not believe them anymore they lie cheat and steal from the taxpayer to pad their ego and massive monetary agenda with our hard eared tax dollars that WE THE PEOPLE go to work for every day. All merchandise,product, services,everything is going to get more expensive. So therefore it is a double indemnity to us.

  2. CLiff fava

    January 21, 2020 9:45 am

    Maybe just maybe the Governor is putting forward a plan to toll only trucks, have the gantries put in place throughout the state in hopes that the Rhode Island decision favors the truckers not the state of R.I. Then with the tolling gantries built and ready to go Connecticut will revert back to tolling all of us. Clever move?

  3. Jeffrey Chipokas

    January 8, 2020 8:35 pm

    The Democratic legislators in this State are dumber than whale crap if they actually
    believe passing a toll bill would not hurt their getting reelected. Obviously, they
    are not listening to the large number of CT residents! NO TOLLS!
    I would really like to see if these same people run their home budgets the same way
    they run our State’s budget. ‘Spending on projections and not actual revenue in hand!’
    And, Mr. ‘MalMont’ stop acting like a spoiled child, accept what is being said by the
    residents NO TOLLS. Stop holding the politicians who are against this at bay and their
    Districts as hostages. There are many more important things you need to address.
    Your ‘bag tax’ has failed! Utter sham!
    Your increased ‘minimum wage’ is hurting businesses small and large regardless of what you
    and your cronies believe. All that is is another money grab….increase wages, take more in taxes!
    Election time is coming closer and your dumb antics keep increasing and the real ‘lies’
    are being recognized. I didn’t vote for you and your cronies originally and I sure won’t vote for you or
    them now. I guess I saw through your lying eyes Mr. MalMont!!!!
    God save Connecticut!

  4. MARIAN MORRISSETTE

    January 8, 2020 5:27 pm

    Are you people out of your mind? Who do you think will pay for these tolls? Well I can tell you, it won’t be the truckers and it won’t be the company that they work for, and it won’t be the businesses that take in the merchandise. It will be YOU and I hard working people just trying to make a living. We can’t afford giving the state more money. They need to cut spending or legalize marijuana to make more money. However they don’t need more money, they need to fix the budget!

  5. William May

    January 8, 2020 3:18 pm

    I think they will put in tolls no matter how we feel about it they continue to run people out of ct I myself eill be leaving soon

Leave a Reply to William May Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SIGN UP TO RECEIVE OUR NEWSLETTER