fbpx Skip to content

A Risky Plan: Connecticut’s Public Option Proposal


By Ken Girardin

Connecticut state officials have proposed entering the private health insurance business to assist residents who are either unable or struggling to afford coverage. Proponents hope to offer a “public option” insurance plan to small businesses, labor unions, nonprofit organizations, and potentially individuals, using the state employee healthcare program as the template, that would offer lower premiums and lower out-of-pocket costs than current insurance options.  

Unlike other states that have experimented with public options, the Connecticut proposal would place risk on taxpayers instead of private insurers.

What’s more, the state’s track record in selling insurance, or otherwise managing insurance plans, raises serious questions about how a public option would be run.

Connecticut’s Partnership Plan 2.0, the basis for the public option, is a health plan run by the state comptroller that piggybacks on the state employee health plan network to provide comparable benefits to local government employees. But premium and claims data show it has operated at a significant loss, engaged in predatory pricing to capture market share, and used premiums from new enrollees to conceal red ink. Had such unsavory tactics been attempted by a private insurer, the state Insurance Department likely would have shut down the plan years ago.

The state has a mixed record in other plan-management efforts. In running its own employee health plan, the

state’s attempts to save money from policy tweaks have overall fallen about 40 percent short of its goals—and the state comptroller is over a year late in producing the latest assessment. HUSKY, the state’s Medicaid program, has previously come under fire from federal auditors for ignoring problems and failing to police fraud aggressively.

Rather than entering the insurance business, state officials should instead examine how existing state programs could be improved to cover more people—and how state policies should be changed to make coverage more affordable for others.

This undertaking should begin with scrutiny of the state’s two primary efforts: HUSKY and Access Health CT, the health insurance exchange. More than a quarter of the state’s uninsured population appears already to qualify for HUSKY but has not enrolled. Meanwhile, the number of people buying coverage on the exchange has decreased for the past three years.

Instead of getting into the health insurance business, state officials should work to reduce the extent to which state policies have increased healthcare costs through taxes and regulations on providers. They should draw lessons from the early days of the novel coronavirus pandemic, when Governor Lamont suspended various rules to stream- line healthcare services that allowed residents to use telemedicine and authorized out-of-state doctors to treat Connecticut patients under their home-state licenses. And they should foster, not impede, innovation and competition among healthcare providers by reforming Connecticut’s Certificate of Need rules.


  1. Click beneath report to expand screen for full view.
  2. Click on side arrows to flip the pages.
  3. Click on “+” or “-” to zoom in and out on pages.
  4. Click on bottom navigation bar to view the Table of Contents.

Yankee Staff

Yankee Institute is a 501(c)(3) research and citizen education organization that does not accept government funding. Yankee Institute develops and advances free-market, limited-government solutions in Connecticut. As one of America’s oldest state-based think tanks, Yankee is a leading advocate for smart, limited government; fairness for taxpayers; and an open road to opportunity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *