fbpx Skip to content

Stay Up to Date!

Zip Code
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Treasurer’s Office: Teacher unions helped on controversial pension changes

The Office of the State Treasurer says that it worked with teachers’ union officials, the Governor’s Office and the Office of Policy and Management on pension changes that union officials are now telling their members are “illegal.”

Language included in the 2019 Connecticut budget revised the death benefit pension payout for Connecticut teachers who adopt Plan N as their retirement package. 

The plan allows for the largest annual pension payout but draws down on a teacher’s retirement contribution at a faster rate, leaving less money for a lump sum payout to the retiree’s spouse if the retired teacher passes away.

In email communications with numerous teachers’ union officials and local presidents, a lobbyist with the American Federation of Teachers Connecticut said they consider the changes “illegal” and are working behind the scenes to reverse the change.

But, according to Greg Gerratana, spokesman for the State Treasurer’s Office, teachers’ union officials helped in drafting the legislation changing the pension formula.

“Plan N was changed as part of the [Teachers Retirement Fund – Special Capital Reserve Fund] legislation that was included in the 2019 budget,” Gerratana wrote in an email. “The teachers’ union officials worked on these changes alongside the Treasurer, OPM and the Governor’s Office.”

Gerratana added, “We are not aware that the teachers’ union officials consider the change illegal.”

Those statements may come as a surprise to teacher union members and local presidents included on the February 21 email chain, in which one former AFT CT vice-president labeled the change “the biggest loss of all time.”

According to the emails between AFT CT legislative outreach director Teri Merisotis and other union officials, OPM is amending the law so that it only affects new teachers, but Merisotis claimed the union was pushing back against the change anyway.

“These changes we believe are in violation of existing case law and we are exploring different legal options in the event that political options fail us,” Merisotis wrote.

The change to Plan N was part of the state’s restructuring of its teacher pension debt, the payments of which threatened to grow to unsupportable levels by 2032. Gov. Ned Lamont and State Treasurer Shawn Wooden set aside $300 million to back 2008 teacher pension bonds in order to stretch out the payments until 2045.

Gerratana says the changes to Plan N do not affect the restructuring and that the change has been included in the Teachers’ Retirement Fund valuation report.

Unlike state employee retirement benefits, teacher retirement benefits are set in statute and require a legislative vote to be changed.

Teacher retirement benefits are managed by the Connecticut Teachers Retirement Board, which includes designees appointed by the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management Melissa McCaw, State Treasurer Shawn Wooden and the Commissioner of Education Miguel Cardona, along with retired and active teachers.

Connecticut’s unfunded teacher pension liabilities are one of the fast-growing fixed costs in state government. Connecticut currently pays $1.2 billion per year in annual costs. Payments are projected to grow to $1.6 billion by 2024.

Marc E. Fitch

Marc E. Fitch is the author of several books and novels including Shmexperts: How Power Politics and Ideology are Disguised as Science and Paranormal Nation: Why America Needs Ghosts, UFOs and Bigfoot. Marc was a 2014 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow and his work has appeared in The Federalist, American Thinker, The Skeptical Inquirer, World Net Daily and Real Clear Policy. Marc has a Master of Fine Arts degree from Western Connecticut State University. Marc can be reached at [email protected]

1 Comment

  1. Dorothy Mautte
    March 4, 2020 @ 12:12 pm

    We keep reading about unfunded liabilities. It would be interesting, helpful and actually lawful if we could see a detailed accounting for where Connecticut actually spends our tax dollars — not just vague categories that could mask a host of items most CT taxpayers would never have approved. It frustrates me every time I read of a new “dog park” being funded or some similar “benefit” when we can’t afford our basic bills. When will CT again become government by the people instead of a government by our representatives and strong lobbyists.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *