Search
Back

Yankee Institute Study Finds “Economic Incentives” for Big Business Don’t Work

Days after United Technologies announced it will move its corporate headquarters to the Boston area following a merger with Raytheon, a new policy paper from the Yankee Institute highlights many of the mistakes made by Connecticut regarding business in the state — especially forking over money to corporations.

Coauthored by Suzanne Bates, a Senior Fellow at the Institute, and Mark Gius, professor of economics at Quinnipiac University, the policy paper entitled “No Way to Do Business” underscores how economic incentives aren’t enough to keep businesses in a state when tax rates are rising.

The 2016–2017 state budget, which included $1.3 billion in tax increases over two years, led to companies like GE either leaving the state or taking counter-measures to reduce their tax burden.

“Those who champion tax increases, whether on businesses or individuals, rarely think about the changes people will make to try to avoid paying higher taxes,” said Bates about the paper’s findings.

“State lawmakers should think about that when they propose tax increases. Taxes do in fact change behavior,” she said.

Proponents of the tax increases estimated $481 million in receipts from corporations for the two-year period, but in reality the taxes only brought in $323 million — just 67 percent of what they originally projected.

But during that time, the state’s Department of Economic and Community Development shelled out nearly $358 million in grants or loans to businesses to either move to Connecticut or, if they were already here, to stay put.

Many of the recipients of the DECD’s largesse are hardly strapped for cash and the economic incentives from the state did little to keep them from ultimately deciding to relocate.

United Technologies received a large, multi-year tax credit incentive to construct a new Pratt & Whitney headquarters, keep Sikorsky’s headquarters in Connecticut for five years and build new labs at United Technologies Research Center, according to a 2016 annual report by DECD.

The deal said nothing about United Technologies corporate headquarters, however, which will now be moved.

Then there’s the liquor titan Diageo, owner of such little-known brands as Smirnoff vodka and Guinness.

In January, Diageo announced that it’s moving its headquarters from Norwalk to New York City, while keeping a satellite office of 250 employees in Stamford. In 2004, the DECD gave Diageo an incentive package to move all the way from Stamford ten miles up I-95 to Norwalk.

Not all of the DECD’s favored children are household names.

Fifth Street, a conglomerate of financial companies owned by Leonard Tannenbaum, received $5 million to move from White Plains to Connecticut in 2013. The Securities and Exchange Commission then discovered Tannenbaum was running a pyramid scheme and the whole thing collapsed, taking much of the taxpayers’ money with it. So far the state has collected a little over half a million back.

Worse still, much of the $358 million the DECD doled out in FY 2016 was borrowed — $169 million, or almost half — which means Connecticut taxpayers are paying interest on it.

Connecticut only saw 0.2 percent job growth, 0.5 percent wage growth, and overall economic growth of just 1 percent in 2016

But Bates believes the DECD could do some good if it changed its focus.

“What if the DECD was a champion with state lawmakers for all businesses?” she said. “It’s tricky because the DECD is ultimately a state agency, and so has to adhere to the policies of the current governor and legislature.”

“But it would be great to see someone lead the agency who was willing to say the hard things — to tell the truth about why we don’t see more economic growth in Connecticut.”

Gov. Ned Lamont’s Tolling Promises and Diversions: A Look at the Numbers

Even if Gov. Ned Lamont gets his tolling bill through the General Assembly during a special session, his plan, the budget and proposed reductions to the gasoline tax and bus fare would amount to $288 million in either less revenue to the Special Transportation Fund or increased public transportation subsidies. ...

Read More

Connecticut’s Exodus Gets its Own Facebook Page

Debra had a question: are people really moving out of Connecticut? And if so, why and to where? So, she started a Facebook group called “People Who Have Left or are Leaving Connecticut,” to get answers to who, what, why and, most importantly, where Connecticut residents are going. In just ...

Read More

Jackson Kuhl

(3) Comments

  1. Domenic

    June 13, 2019 1:19 pm

    Stop offering incentives other than tax breaks.. Let low taxes drive the state’s economy.. Companies make HQ decisions on cost, location and logistics..

  2. Brad

    June 12, 2019 11:09 pm

    Yankee Institute’s whining gets tiresome after a while. Visit the cafeteria in Pratt & Whitney’s world class Engineering and Technology Center, which was paid for in part by state funds. You’ll see the place packed with brilliant engineers in their 20s. These people are the future of Connecticut, and of the US’s industrial base. Clearly Connecticut’s business climate can be improved. But it’s not being improved by the complainers. If Yankee Institute wants to get out of the peanut gallery, it needs to recognize CTs pension liabilities and advocate for specific actions. Those actions won’t be popular or easy. And while you’re at it, how about highlighting an example of what’s working?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SIGN UP TO RECEIVE OUR NEWSLETTER