Parents file suit over Hartford magnet school racial quotas

Seven families with children in the Hartford public school system filed suit against the State Department of Education, the Hartford Public Schools Board of Education and Gov. Dannel Malloy — among others — today over what they say are unfair enrollment quotas for Hartford’s magnet school system.

The plaintiffs, represented by attorney Joshua Thompson of the Pacific Legal Foundation, announced the lawsuit during a press conference at the Capitol earlier this morning.

Hartford’s magnet schools use racial quotas and a lottery system to determine which students are accepted into one of the city’s alternative school options.

Hartford magnet schools have to reserve 25 percent of its seats for white or Asian students and are limited to only 75 percent African-American or Hispanic enrollment. However, the quotas have left some seats empty when the school isn’t able to enroll enough white or Asian students.

The lottery system has also been bypassed in some cases as magnet schools tried to enroll star athletes, according to both a Hartford Courant report and an audit by the state auditors.

The complaint, filed today in district court, says “these schools are literally mandated to leave desks unoccupied if enrolling an additional black or Hispanic child would upset the racial quota. Turned away from Hartford’s best schools, these black and Hispanic students are forced into Hartford’s failing neighborhood schools, where their hope for a bright future is, all-too-often, extinguished.”

The plaintiffs are Hartford parents who have continually tried to enroll their children in Hartford’s magnet school system but have been denied.

The press release issued by the Pacific Legal Foundation, which is representing the Hartford parents, lists LeShawn Robinson as one of the plaintiffs.

Robinson says the racial quotas prevent students like her son Jarod from having equal access to a good school. “Even if I want Jarod to have a seat, he can’t get in unless kids from the suburbs come in too. It’s like Connecticut says, ‘You have to have a white kid in a classroom for a black kid to be educated.’”

The Hartford magnet school system was created in response to the Sheff v. O’Neill Connecticut Supreme Court decision which ruled that Hartford’s racial segregation of students — although unintentional — violated their constitutional rights.

The magnet schools were formed in order to create more racial balance and give Hartford public school students access to better schools.

Thompson says the “race-based admissions” also violate the students’ constitutional rights.

“We are fighting for their right to get the best education possible, and their race shouldn’t deny them the opportunity to attend an excellent school,” Thompson said.

The Connecticut State Department of Education was not able to offer comment because the case is pending.

The Attorney General’s Office said they will review any complaint and respond appropriately in court, but declined to offer further comment.

The Pacific Legal Foundation lists itself as “a group of individuals united in our belief that personal liberty is essential to a thriving and prosperous society.” The group represents clients for free and challenges onerous government laws and regulations.

CT AFL-CIO asks Lamont to extend executive order for schools through June, warns of new shutdown

President of the CT AFL-CIO Sal Luciano sent a letter to Gov. Ned Lamont requesting the governor extend his executive order requiring school districts to continue paying staff and vendors until June of 2021 in case schools are forced to close again. “We ask you to quickly issue a new ...

Read More

Emails show teacher unions have little leverage for school reopening demands: “My educators are very upset.”

A coalition of unions representing teachers, paraprofessionals, janitors and bus drivers issued 13 “non-negotiable” standards for school reopening and have pushed for districts to delay in-person teaching for two weeks, but, according to the unions’ own assessment, they have little say in the matter.  Union leaders have publicly expressed their ...

Read More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *