fbpx Skip to content

Stay Up to Date!

Contact Us

Zip Code
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Director of External Affairs Bryce Chinault testifies in opposition against the proposed ban of gas-powered vehicles by 2035

The adoption of these regulations from the California Air Resources Board will only serve to export Connecticut’s transportation emissions overseas, increase the cost of car ownership and infrastructure, and fails to recognize the reality of electricity generation and costs in our state and region.

According to the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP), Connecticut’s transportation sector comprises all of an estimated 0.04%2 of global carbon emissions.3 Eliminating every single carbon emission from the transportation sector here will have an undetectable effect on anthropogenic climate change according to the IPCC.4 This policy will not even achieve that goal and will increase emissions outside of Connecticut.

The manufacturing of electric vehicle (EV) batteries requires heavy industrial mining for minerals such as lithium, manganese, graphite and cobalt.5 The majority of mining for cobalt, to use one example, occurs in the country of Congo, where extensive child labor is used to get it out of the ground along with energy intensive machinery which run on various forms of petroleum.6 There have been long running concerns over fuel shortages in the future for internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs), but ignoring the limit on current mines7 and total minerals available on Earth that are required to create EVs at scale is shortsighted at best.8

After the mining process occurs, these minerals must be shipped to where they can be processed. The majority of EV mineral processing occurs in China9 which is the planet’s largest carbon emitter and is building new coal-powered power plants every week to fuel the industry.10

This mining, processing, manufacturing, and shipping – on diesel-powered cargo ships11 – means an EV has emitted far more carbon to arrive at your home than an ICEV.12 Current estimates find that EVs must be driven for 60,000 miles or more to generate emissions reductions when compared to ICEVs.13

Given that EVs are heavier, thanks to their massive batteries, they also lead to increased wear and tear of roads, tires, brakes, etc. than comparable ICEVs which require more carbon emissions to replace them over time – further reducing the proposed benefit they provide.14 Heavier vehicles also cause higher accident-related fatalities.15

Any potential net reduction in carbon emissions based on this regulatory change will not be realized until after an EV has been driven on our roads for years – assuming it stays charged in the winter16 and doesn’t catch fire in the summer.17

Electric vehicles also cost nearly twice as much to purchase as comparable gasoline powered cars.18 To offset this, Connecticut taxpayers have provided some of the most generous subsidies in the country.19 And yet, less than 0.75% of all vehicles on Connecticut’s roads are electric,20 and the vast majority of households that own an electric vehicle also own a gas-powered one.21

Connecticut also has some of the highest electricity costs in the nation, currently 49th out of 50 states in residential electricity rates.22 With no foreseeable increases in access to cheap natural gas, renewable breakthroughs, or nuclear investments; Connecticut residents will only be paying more and using less as EVs drastically increase demand on the electrical grid.23

California recently issued an alert to residents asking them not to charge their EVs during certain time periods to avoid overburdening its grid,24 and that is with around 3% of all registered cars in the state being electric.25 There will need to be a massive increase in electric energy supply across the country if EVs are going to comprise a significant portion of the automobile market.

U.S. taxpayers provided $30 billion in subsidies to support the EV market in 2021 alone,26 and $5 billion of taxpayer resources have been allocated to build out EV charging stations across the country over the next several years.27 Taxpayers have been subsidizing the sale and necessary infrastructure for EVs for decades and yet they only comprise a very small portion of the market and almost all of the benefits have gone to the wealthiest of U.S. residents.28 This proposed regulation will make it inevitable that taxpayers will have to fund even more charging infrastructure and EV production in order for Connecticut to reach these California imposed rules.

Connecticut’s car dealer franchise regulations also decrease the supply and increase the costs of electric vehicles.29 Further eliminating competition by banning ICEVs will only drive-up costs.

These costs will be barriers to Connecticut residents enjoying the freedom of car ownership, and we will also be taking away their most valuable resource: time. Depending on the car and charger, it can take the better part of a day to get a full charge, compare that with few minutes it takes someone to stop in at the pump and fill up at their leisure.30 This also raises concerns over safety for people who cannot access a charged vehicle during an emergency or are forced to charge in an undesired location for an extended period of time.31

In Norway the majority of new cars are actually electric, which demonstrates that it is possible to achieve the goal – at least in the short-term – but the country has provided massive subsidies for each car32 and has been able to afford that through the selling of the nation’s largest export: barrels of oil.33

This policy is completely unreasonable for the people of Connecticut. It will not achieve its stated goal, and it will negatively affect every resident and business, disproportionally harming low-income households.

Yankee Institute urges DEEP to forgo adoption of this regulation, and for the Connecticut General Assembly to repeal or amend Section 22a-174g of the General Statutes of Connecticut to not bind the hands of our state regulators to adopt rules passed 3,000 miles away by policymakers who are completely unaccountable to the people of Connecticut.

Thank you again for the opportunity to submit comments against proposed regulation PR2023-023: Adoption of California Light Duty Vehicle Emission Standards for 2027-2035.

Bryce N.Y. Chinault

Director of External Affairs, Yankee Institute

[email protected]


1 Yankee Institute is a non-profit organization based in Hartford, CT: https://yankeeinstitute.org

2 Connecticut Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory, CTDepartmentofEnergyandEnvironmentalProtection: https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/DEEP/climatechange/1990-2021-GHG-Inventory/DEEP_GHG_Report_90-21_Final.pdf 3 CO2 Emissions in 2022, InternationalEnergyAgency: https://www.iea.org/news/global-co2-emissions-rose-less- than-initially-feared-in-2022-as-clean-energy-growth-offset-much-of-the-impact-of-greater-coal-and-oil-use#

4 Summary for Policymakers, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/

5 Minerals Used in Electric Cars Compared to Conventional Cars, International Energy Agency:


6 How ‘Modern-Day Slavery’ in the Congo Powers the Rechargeable Battery Economy, NationalPublicRadio: https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/02/01/1152893248/red-cobalt-congo-drc- mining-siddharth-kara

7 Dig This: The Shift to EVs Requires a Massive Expansion of Battery Metal Mining, Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alanohnsman/2022/09/19/dig-this-the-shift-to-evs-requires-a-massive-expansion-of-battery-metal-mining/

8 Why the Rush to Mine Lithium Could Dry Up the High Andes, Yale School of the Environment: https://e360.yale.edu/features/lithium-mining-water-andes-argentina

9 Why a Chinese Company Dominates Electric Car Batteries, New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/22/business/china-catl-electric-car-batteries.html

10 China is Building Six Times More New Coal Plants than Other Countries, National Public Radio: https://www.npr.org/2023/03/02/1160441919/china-is-building-six-times-more-new-coal-plants-than-other-countries-report-fin

11 How Much Fuel Does a Cargo Ship Use?, Maritime Page: https://maritimepage.com/fuel-consumption-how-much-fuel-cargo-ship-use

12 The Race to Decarbonize Electric-Vehicle Batteries, McKinsey & Company: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/the-race-to-decarbonize-electric-vehicle-batteries

13 Electric Vehicles for Everyone? The Impossible Dream, Manhattan Institute: https://manhattan.institute/article/electric-vehicles-for-everyone-the-impossible-dream

14 Comparison of Total PM Emissions Emitted from Electric and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles: An Experimental Analysis, Science of The Total Environment: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972204058X

15 Make Electric Vehicles Lighter to Maximize Climate and Safety Benefits, Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02760-8

16 How Well Do Electric Cars Work in Cold Weather, Cars.com: https://www.cars.com/articles/how-well-do-electric-cars-work-in-cold-weather-459914/

17 Report Identifies Issue with Liquid Accumulating in EV Batteries, Including CT Bus that Burned, CT Insider: https://www.ctinsider.com/news/article/ct-ev-bus-fire-lithium-battery-ntsb-report-18206381.php  

18 Gas vs. Hybrid vs. Electric Cars: A Complete Guide, The Zebra: https://www.thezebra.com/resources/driving/gas-car-vs-hybrid-car-vs-electric-car/

19 Top States for Electric Vehicle Incentives 2023, Vault Electricity: https://www.vaultelectricity.com/top-states-for-electric-vehicle-incentives/

20 Report: CT’s EV Market Share Grew by 3.64% in Q4, CT News Junkie: https://ctnewsjunkie.com/2022/03/22/report-cts-ev-market-share-grew-by-3-64-in-q4/

21 Electric Vehicles in Multi-Vehicle Households, Energy Institute at Haas, University of California, Berkeley: https://haas.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/WP322.pdf

22 Electric Power Monthy, Table 5.6.A Average Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector, U.S. Energy Information Administration: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php

23 Final 2023 Transportation Electrification Forecast, ISO-New England: https://www.iso-ne.com/static-assets/documents/2023/04/transfx2023_final.pdf

24 Californians Told Not to Charge EVs as Grid Struggles in Heat Wave, Barron’s: https://www.barrons.com/news/californians-told-not-to-charge-evs-as-grid-struggles-in-heat-wave-01661978409

25 Automobile Registrations in the United States in 2021, by State, Statista: https://www.statista.com/statistics/196010/total-number-of-registered-automobiles-in-the-us-by-state

26 Global EV Outlook 2022, International Energy Agency: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook- 2022/executive-summary

27 Historic Step: All Fifty States Plus D.C. and Puerto Rico Greenlit to Move EV Charging Networks Forward, Covering 75,000 Miles of Highway, U.S. Department of Transportation: https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/historic-step-all-fifty-states-plus-dc-and-puerto-rico-greenlit-move-ev-charging

28 Today in Energy, U.S. Energy Information Administration: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=36312  

Bryce Chinault

Bryce joined Yankee Institute after nearly a decade of working in federal and state level policy analysis at the George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center and the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. In those roles, Bryce worked directly with members of Congress, executive agencies, governors, state legislators, and local officials to engage on a diverse range of policy topics and enact positive reforms for everyday people across the country. A native of Cambridge, WI, Bryce moved to Connecticut to be closer to his wife’s family in her hometown of Newtown. Bryce earned a Master of Public Policy degree from George Mason University and a B.A. in Political Science from the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. He is also the loving father of two amazing kids.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *