“Raising taxes in response to this economic downturn ignores twelve years of Connecticut’s economic and fiscal history – and will only chop any chance of recovery off at the knees. Connecticut now has an opportunity to gain wealthy residents fleeing New York City and thereby increase its high-income tax base. ...
Hard to Soak the Rich When They’re Sopping Wet
by Fergus Cullen
This article ran in the Waterbury Republican-American on May 31, 2009
As Gov. M. Jodi Rell and state legislators struggle to close the state budget deficit and balance the next one, a familiar chorus has risen on the left: Tax the rich! Advocates for bigger government argue that the wealthy aren’t paying their “fair share.”
New Haven-based Connecticut Voices for Children, an advocacy group that lobbies for more government spending for a variety of social programs, believes “those who can best afford it” should pay higher taxes for more state government. Specifically, Voices complains that Connecticut’s income tax is “not progressive enough” and seeks to raise the top income tax rate on the rich from 5 percent to as high as 8 percent.
Wall Street money managers encamped on Greenwich estates may make convenient bogeymen for those who begrudge the financial success of others, but a new study by the Yankee Institute for Public Policy (yankeeinstitute.org) shows that Connecticut’s rich pay many times more than their fair share of taxes.
The state income tax is the single largest source of revenue for the State of Connecticut, raising $6.2 billion in 2007. It is a progressive tax, with rates ranging from 3 to 5 percent as income rises. The top rate increased a half a point in 2003.
The story of who pays the state income tax is a classic example of the “80/20” rule: The bottom 80 percent of taxpayers – those filing at under $100,000 – account for 20 percent of income tax revenues, while the top 20 percent of income earners pay 80 percent of income tax receipts. The very affluent pay a hugely disproportionate amount of income taxes. The top 6 percent of taxpayers – those earning more than $250,000 annually – pay over half of all income taxes. The top 1.3 percent of taxpayers – those earning more than $1 million per year – pay 35 percent of all income taxes.
The rest of us? The bottom 60 percent of Connecticut taxpayers – those with incomes under about $60,000 – pay less than 10 percent of state income taxes, and the bottom 40 percent of all filers – those with incomes of less than $35,000 – effectively pay no state income taxes.
The average state income tax bill for the wealthiest 1.3 percent of filers – just 23,000 returns – was $93,000. This means that the wealthiest 1.3 percent paid more in state income taxes alone than nearly 80 percent of the state’s population earned. The rich also pay disproportionate shares of state sales taxes, inheritance and estate taxes, and real estate conveyance taxes.
Contrary to Voices’ contention that the rich are not paying their fair share, in reality the state is heavily dependent on this very small number of prime taxpayers. It’s hard to soak the rich when they are already sopping wet.
The poor may always be with us, but will the rich? Wealthy people can – and do – move from higher-tax states to lower-tax places. An American Legislative Exchange Council study published in March found that 1,100 people a day move from the nine highest income tax states to the nine states without an income tax.
If five percent of all Connecticut millionaires – or just three of them a day for a year – move out of the state or make a state like Florida their primary residence in response to higher taxes, Connecticut’s budget deficit would grow by over $100 million due to lost income tax revenue alone.
Others simply choose not to move to high-tax states in the first place. The Manhattan Institute’s E.J. McMahon found that Connecticut ranked 50th in the nation in terms of the rate of increase in the number of wealthy filers (those with Adjusted Gross Incomes of $200,000 or higher) between the years 2002-2005 – despite these being years of historic gains on nearby Wall Street.
Connecticut is losing the competition for the nation’s biggest taxpayers. These same affluent people who move away or never migrate also tend to be employers, compounding the effect of their decisions to pay less in taxes elsewhere.
States should covet, not castigate, the rich. Tax policy should be designed to retain and attract them, not drive them away.
Fergus Cullen is Executive Director of the Yankee Institute, a Hartford think tank that advocates free market solutions to public policy issues. He can be reached at email@example.com
**UPDATE: Gov. Lamont issued an executive order at approximately 8:30 p.m. on May 13 extending the suspension of the plastic bag tax until June 30. Executive Order 7NN can be viewed here. Yankee’s original article pointing out the tax would begin again on May 15 was published at noon on ...