fbpx Skip to content

Finance Committee approves $46 million in bonding so UConn can hire researchers

The Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee approved a bill that would allow $46 million in state bonding for the University of Connecticut to hire more research faculty.

The bill comes as UConn and UConn Health officials also asked the General Assembly to relieve them of roughly $100 million in unfunded pension payments, which they say is causing researchers to take their grants and leave the university for more cost-efficient higher education institutions. 

The bonding bill, passed by a wide majority of Finance Committee members, would allow bonding through 2026 for UConn to “commence a research recruitment and hiring program” to find qualified faculty.

“Under such program, the university shall encourage and facilitate the creation of new business ventures in the state that fuel economic growth,” according to the bill.

UConn President Tom Katsouleas testified that the bill “will provide us with the necessary resources to hire 10 new faculty who will turn their research discoveries into new technologies, products and companies.” 

According to Katsouleas, UConn’s research programs have fostered 51 new startups and 132 companies since 2003. “Last year our start-ups raised over $463 million in private equity and created 208 jobs,” Katsouleas wrote. “For every research dollar that UConn attracts in externally sponsored research and spends within the state, 80 cents in economic output is generated elsewhere in the state economy.”

“This puts UConn in the position to go out and find the best and the brightest, not only in terms of research but in innovation entrepreneurship,” said Finance Committee co-chair John Fonfara, D-Hartford. “I think that this is one of those votes that when you look back at your time here, you will be most proud of.”

Sen. Tony Hwang, R-Fairfield, said that “this is not to distinguish between some aspects of UConn that need significant discipline and fiscal accountability.”

“But in this case, we’re competing with a marketplace that is world-wide for academic talent, and we can’t be short-sighted in that respect,” Hwang said. 

Although the bill was passed on a bipartisan basis, some lawmakers were hesitant to bond state money to pay the salaries of university research faculty.

“I just share deep concerns about the ability of UConn and their management to pull this off given the history of cost overruns, construction overruns and the bad history at UConn Health,” said Sen. Paul Formica, R-East Lyme.

Sen. Henri Martin, R-Bristol, questioned why UConn hasn’t tapped its reported $476 million endowment to support the hiring of top research talent.

“They have an endowment and if they really believe in this plan they have – and I’ve listened to it a couple times now – why are they not using their endowment in order to invest in themselves for this cause?” Martin said.

“They’re using our money. We have to go bond for it. They have an endowment,” Martin said.

Fonfara said the cost in salaries “will pale in comparison to what they bring to our state” and countered that UConn is Connecticut’s flagship university and a creation of the state and should therefore be supported by the state.

UConn officials have also told lawmakers that Connecticut’s unfunded pension costs were driving researchers to other universities because the extremely high fringe benefit rates were consuming grant dollars.

In a presentation to the Appropriations Committee, UConn outlined a loss of roughly $17 million in research grant dollars lost because researchers left for other, lower-cost universities.

UConn currently receives nearly $400 million in state support through a block grant and fringe benefit relief payments, according to UConn’s budget presentation.

The General Assembly and Gov. John Rowland also allowed UConn to issue $2.4 billion in bonds for the UConn 2000 project, which, at the time, was pitched as a way of preventing “brain drain” by students going out of state for higher education.

The UConn 2000 bond program has been extended several times to allow up to $4.6 billion in bonds, according to the State Treasurer’s annual report. UConn pays the debt service on those bonds.

Fonfara made it clear he saw this bonding program as key to Connecticut’s economic growth and development.

“We have not had net new job growth in this state in twenty years, our wages are stagnant, we’re not very good at building an economy,” Fonfara said. “We’ve enjoyed for decades the legacy of so many corporations some which when the decide they’re going to close or leave we quake because we aren’t building a bench to replace those corporations.” 

Marc E. Fitch

Marc E. Fitch is the author of several books and novels including Shmexperts: How Power Politics and Ideology are Disguised as Science and Paranormal Nation: Why America Needs Ghosts, UFOs and Bigfoot. Marc was a 2014 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow and his work has appeared in The Federalist, American Thinker, The Skeptical Inquirer, World Net Daily and Real Clear Policy. Marc has a Master of Fine Arts degree from Western Connecticut State University. Marc can be reached at [email protected]


  1. John C Miller Jr
    April 29, 2021 @ 1:43 pm

    how about addressing the unfunded pension liability issue before burdening the taxpayers of connecticut with more debt? isn’t it odd that researchers are leaving uconn for more affordable universities? maybe some thought should be given by our fearless leaders in hartford to find ways to make uconn and the state of connecticut more affordable instead of burdening the taxpayers with more debt and higher taxes.


    • fred Carstensen
      July 3, 2021 @ 4:10 pm

      We ae unlikely to meet the challenge of those unfunded liabilities without economic growth. Connecticut’s economy has shrunk over the last decade–the worst performing state economy in the nation. What is critical is changing the State’s trajectory. The issue here is whether this is a strategy likely to deliver that outcome (it isn’t; see separate comment).

      No investments to change the trajectory will only result in the state being even worse off going forward.


  2. Fred carstensen
    July 3, 2021 @ 4:17 pm

    What this leaves out is a larger frame of reference or perspective. nine years ago the state provided uconn $1.5 billion with the promise that uconn who hire great new faculty and raise its ranking. It failed to do so. Uconn’s ranking as a research university has falled significantly, from 64th to the low 80s. Its external funding in real terms has achieved little growth. Its measured economic impact of external funding (job creation) has fallen perhaps 60%; the impact of the whole university appears to have fallen relative to its size.

    perhaps uconn has a strategy that will make such a small number of hires pay off (University of Florida is hiring five hundred (500!) new faculty–yes, 500!) by making multiple hires in the same area, but that doesn’t appear to be the case as UConn points to nearly as many fields as new hires.

    If $1.5 billion failed to deliver, why would $46 million, which is less than what the football progam losses every couple of years? let’s have an honest discussion about how uconn can become a stronger research university and make a more meaningful contribution to connecticut’s economic recovery.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *