fbpx Skip to content

Stay Up to Date!

Zip Code
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

A Connecticut Cat Tax?

While not a tax per se, a bill to impose a $15 fee on the purchase of a dog, cat or “other domestic animal” from a municipal shelter received a public hearing on Monday.

Notably, Senate Bill 999 would also require the licensure of cats and other pets and allow the municipality to collect a fee up to $150 for the costs of spaying, neutering or vaccinating the animals.

The licensing for each animal would range from two to fifteen dollars, depending on the type of pet and whether it has been spayed or neutered.

The bill is supported by the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities because the measure would provide additional funds for municipal animal shelters, but opponents say the bill is too broad and fees will reduce adoption rates and increase the number of animals that shelters are forced to euthanize.

Annie Hornish, Connecticut senior state director for the Humane Society, opposed the bill saying public participation would likely be low and the cost for administering the program could exceed revenue. 

She also worried the measure would impose fees on people who care for “community cats,” more commonly known as feral cats, which would otherwise be euthanized. “Community cat caregivers do a great public service, largely at private expense, and should be applauded – not handed another financial burden,” Cornish wrote.

Without a clear definition, as written this would require licenses and tags for all animals, from hamsters and guinea pigs to reptiles, and would also include fish.

Courtney Hogan, government affairs manager for the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Committee

Courtney Hogan, government affairs manager for the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Committee, says the language in the bill is too broad, potentially applying to all pets. “Without a clear definition, as written this would require licenses and tags for all animals, from hamsters and guinea pigs to reptiles, and would also include fish.”

The Connecticut Town Clerks Association also testified that licensing cats and other domestic animals would be a “huge added burden to the town clerk’s office,” and offered the idea of creating a statewide, uniform system for dog licensing.

Sources indicate the bill likely originated out of the Department of Agriculture, but so far request for comment has not been returned. 

State Republicans decried the proposal as a “cat tax,” but municipalities have been saying they need more revenue in light of potential state funding cuts and teacher pension cost-sharing measures proposed by Gov. Ned Lamont.

Dog licensing fees brought in $146,100 to the state in 2015.

Marc E. Fitch

Marc E. Fitch is the author of several books and novels including Shmexperts: How Power Politics and Ideology are Disguised as Science and Paranormal Nation: Why America Needs Ghosts, UFOs and Bigfoot. Marc was a 2014 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow and his work has appeared in The Federalist, American Thinker, The Skeptical Inquirer, World Net Daily and Real Clear Policy. Marc has a Master of Fine Arts degree from Western Connecticut State University. Marc can be reached at [email protected]


  1. Joe
    March 14, 2019 @ 5:47 pm

    Democrats tax anything that moves.

    Cars, barbers, cats and dogs.

    Anything that moves.


  2. Dash Riprock
    March 14, 2019 @ 9:30 pm

    Not a tax per se? BULLSHIT. If government levies a charge, it’s a TAX.


  3. Patti A Crowley
    March 15, 2019 @ 11:36 am

    This will cause more innocent animals to be put down. I hate Lamont.


  4. Peter Wight
    March 17, 2019 @ 2:01 pm



  5. Adam
    March 18, 2019 @ 12:38 pm

    Taxes = money, money = power. Has nothing to do with cats or teachers or budgets and everything to do with hording power. Voters still think it’s for their benefit, hahahahahahahahahaha


  6. Diana D
    March 26, 2019 @ 4:27 am

    Lamont this is so MORONIC! A CAT TAX! This will hurt adoptions of animals. Do you want more animals to be put down!! This is INSANE!


    • Carla
      May 17, 2019 @ 1:23 pm

      What idiot thought of this!! There should be a hefty fine for all animal abuse – that would generate money. Or how about this….stop over spending and take a pay cut till you can figure out simple math! You’ve been playing with our money for too long!!! Sick of hearing that we pay for some idiot to write up a nonsense proposal. In the real world you would be fired for wasting company time!


  7. Linda Wall
    April 21, 2019 @ 10:04 am

    Any animal tax will result in more pets being dropped off in the woods, streets and anywhere else they can. Please no tax on animals.


  8. Donna
    May 28, 2019 @ 6:03 pm

    This man is a lunatic. He is clearly out of control and not fit to do this job. There is not one spending cut mentioned in anything he says.


    • Pat Chaddams
      September 16, 2019 @ 9:42 am

      Sorry, no recall elections in CT.

      Wouldn’t it be nice?!?


  9. Chucky Darling
    September 16, 2019 @ 12:20 am

    Hating him is a personal choice. Working against him is a public service.
    If only someone had proof he colluded with the Russians! (or something equally bad! )


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *