The Rhode Island Supreme Court has upheld a Superior Court decision to allow the City of Cranston to cut cost of living adjustments for city retirees, citing the city’s dire fiscal problems. In 2011, Cranston faced a $256 million unfunded pension liability and the city’s pension system was only 16.9 ...
Connecticut pension funding declines 10 percent in seven years
A state employee pension fact sheet released by the Office of Fiscal Analysis on Monday showed that, despite efforts to fully fund Connecticut’s state employee retirement system, the funding ratio has dropped from 48 to 38 percent since 2011.
Connecticut’s unfunded pension liabilities for state employees totaled $21.2 billion as of 2018, according to the state’s valuation.
Required payments to fully fund SERS have grown rapidly since 2009, according to the information provided by OFA.
In 2009, SERS required $753.7 million per year in order to meet its annual required contribution. The state short-changed the pension fund that year by seven percent and continued paying less than the required amount by upwards of 20 percent through 2011.
Under Gov. Dannel Malloy’s administration, Connecticut maintained 100 percent funding from 2012 through 2014. Payments through 2017 hovered around 99 percent.
But the damage had been done. The few years of fully funding the pension system was not enough to undo two decades of short-changing the pension system under a series of agreements between governors Lowell Weicker and John Rowland and the State Employee Bargaining Agent Coalition.
Connecticut state law required the pension system to be fully funded by 1985 and to maintain that funding. Agreements between union leaders and past governor’s, however, overrode that statute and allowed Connecticut to short-change the pension system. The result was a ballooning payment system which is now crowding out other state spending.
According to the OFA fact sheet, annual payments into SERS are projected to grow to $1.7 billion by 2021, a nearly $1 billion increase since 2009.
Part of the decline in Connecticut pension funding ratio may be related to lowering the assumed rate of return for SERS — known as the “discount rate” — from 8 percent to 6.9 percent in 2017.
Connecticut’s pension problem affects nearly every aspect of state government as departments struggle to cope with rising fringe benefit costs due to unfunded liability payments.
Pension payments are part of Connecticut’s “fixed costs” which also include Medicaid, debt services and retirement health benefits. Combined, those costs now account for over 50 percent of state government spending.
Malloy, in 2017, extended the payment period to pay off the pension debt through 2044 in an effort to prevent Connecticut’s payments from spiking too high, too quickly. Gov. Ned Lamont is extending those payments again by a few years in a similar effort to balance the state budget.
Lamont announced he reached a deal with SEBAC leaders to reamortize the pension debt, but details have not yet been released. The change is expected to save the state $271 million over the next two years but will ultimately cost an additional $1 billion in payments over the next twenty years.
Lamont is hoping to make the same arrangement with Connecticut’s teacher pension system. Payments to the Teachers Retirement System threaten to grow much larger between now and 2032, and the Lamont administration is attempting to re-finance the debt without violating a 2008 pension obligation bond.
The fact sheet listed the average active employee salary as $69,743 and the average pension as $38,284.
The most recent numbers from the State Comptroller’s Office show nearly 1,400 retirees recieve six-figure pensions.
Connecticut’s teachers may be better off with a 401(k) style, defined contribution retirement plan than under Connecticut’s massively underfunded pension system, according to some number crunching. Assuming a 6.5 percent employer match and adjusted for inflation, a defined contribution plan could yield similar retirement savings to that of the existing ...