Search
Back

Second Lawsuit Targets Connecticut Magnet School Racial Quotas

The Connecticut Parents Union filed a lawsuit in federal court on February 20 against the state of Connecticut alleging racial quotas meant to keep the state’s magnet schools diverse are actually preventing minority students from gaining access to those schools.

The lawsuit is the second of its kind making its way through the
court system in a challenge to the 1996 Sheff v. O’Neill ruling by the
Connecticut Supreme Court.

The Sheff ruling said that even unintentional racial
segregation in Hartford’s school system was unconstitutional.

CTPU President Gwen Samuel speaking in support of the Robinson lawsuit.

In response, Connecticut created a series of magnet schools to which minority students could apply for admission.

In order to maintain racial diversity, however, at least 25 percent of the student population must be white. This provision has led to some minority students being denied access to the magnet schools because the school was not able to enroll enough white students.

In February of 2018, seven Hartford families filed
a lawsuit alleging the race-based enrollment system violated their
Constitutional rights. That case – Robinson v. Wentzell – challenges the
so-called “Sheff mandate” which established racial enrollment quotas
in the Hartford school district.

Now a second lawsuit – CT Parents Union v. Wentzell — seeks to make the same argument, but at a more state-wide level, challenging Connecticut state law which applied the same Sheff mandate to magnet schools throughout the state.

There should never be a law in the state of Connecticut or anywhere in the country that denies a child access to a safe and quality education because of the color of their skin or income level – period.

President of CT Parents Union Gwen Samuel said in a press release “There should never be a law in the state of Connecticut or anywhere in the country that denies a child access to a safe and quality education because of the color of their skin or income level – period.”

Connecticut magnet schools created in response to the Sheff
ruling have consistently outperformed their public-school counterparts in urban
areas. Enrollment for students is based on a lottery system.

However, a Hartford Courant article in 2017 reported empty seats were left unfilled in magnet schools due to the racial quota system, even for students at the top of the lottery list.

A follow up investigation and audit by the State of Connecticut
found that some magnet schools were bypassing the lottery system for particular
students.

“Incredibly, the state incentivizes public schools to deny black
and Hispanic children opportunities for an exceptional education for no reason
other than skin color,” said Oliver Dunford, the attorney representing CT
Parents Union.

Incredibly, the state incentivizes public schools to deny black and Hispanic children opportunities for an exceptional education for no reason other than skin color.

Dunford is part of the Pacific Legal Foundation, a non-profit
legal team which is also representing LaShawn Robinson in the Robinson v.
Wentzell case.

“This lawsuit aims to protect equal access to education for all
children in Connecticut,” Dunford said.

The Fitch Files: DCF “Weaponized” in Dispute Between Hartford Parents and Teachers’ Union

An April 16 Hartford Board of Education meeting attended by state representative and Hartford teachers’ union vice-president Joshua Hall, D-Hartford, turned rowdy when Hartford parent, Jessie Pierce Jr., confronted the board saying teachers were failing to educate Hartford’s students. Two days later, the Department of Children and Families opened an ...

Read More

Hartford Parents’ Magnet School Challenge to Proceed in Federal Court

Hartford parents who say their children were denied entry into Connecticut’s magnet schools because of state-mandated racial quotas won a legal victory on March 15, when a U.S. District Court judge ruled their lawsuit, Robinson v. Wentzell, should proceed in federal court rather than through the state’s court system. “This ...

Read More

Marc E. Fitch

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SIGN UP TO RECEIVE OUR NEWSLETTER